Florida Energy & Mild, together with a number of teams representing enterprise pursuits, have proposed settling the utility’s historic fee case, which might convey an finish to a battle that impacts the electrical payments of roughly 12 million Floridians.
In a submitting posted late Friday afternoon, Florida Energy & Mild notified regulators that it has reached an settlement with a number of of the teams concerned in its fee case. The checklist of these teams included many enterprise pursuits — equivalent to a federation of retail corporations, Walmart, fuel stations and industrial corporations — however didn’t embody the state-appointed shopper advocate or different teams that characterize residents.
If authorised by regulators, the submitting would enable Florida Energy & Mild to droop the progress of the case, which was scheduled to start two weeks of steady public hearings Monday.
These hearings can result in inside firm paperwork changing into a part of the general public report and firm executives having to reply hours of questions on the witness stand.
As a substitute, members of the Florida Public Service Fee will doubtless convene Monday afternoon to first resolve whether or not to grant the utility’s request to pause the case whereas a settlement is hammered out. That would shift a lot of the dialogue behind closed doorways, as settlement negotiations are confidential. Nevertheless, the teams opposing the settlement will request the extra thorough public proceedings nonetheless be held.
In a information launch, Florida Energy & Mild president Armando Pimentel celebrated the information, saying a settlement can be “a win for our prospects.”
“Any settlement that we attain ought to allow FPL to proceed to make good investments on behalf of our prospects, guaranteeing that we will proceed to offer dependable electrical energy to energy our fast-growing state whereas holding buyer payments low,” his assertion learn.
Florida Energy & Mild’s almost $10 billion fee hike request is taken into account the most important in American historical past. The corporate has additionally been in search of a fee of shareholder revenue that, if authorised as-is, can be the very best within the nation, unbiased researchers have confirmed to the Tampa Bay Instances.
Teams representing largely residential prospects, together with the state-appointed public counsel, opposed the movement to halt the case in favor of a settlement.
In a letter additionally filed Friday, they informed regulators they’d submit a extra full-throated opposition Monday, however within the meantime have been nonetheless getting ready for the scheduled public hearings. Public Counsel Walt Trierweiler has beforehand railed towards the corporate’s request for an uncommon mechanism that he mentioned would enable prospects to be double-charged with the intention to jack up shareholder earnings.
“Having a public listening to is a public good,” mentioned Bradley Marshall, a lawyer who represents three shopper and environmental teams within the fee case.
He famous that about 93% of Florida Energy & Mild’s prospects are residents, but the proponents of this settlement would largely be companies.
“It’s a small however well-represented minority of FPL’s prospects,” Marshall mentioned.
In response to a query in regards to the hearings, Florida Energy & Mild spokesperson Andrew Sutton mentioned if a settlement is reached, there would nonetheless be public dialogue about its contents.
“The settlement settlement will likely be offered to the (Public Service Fee) for its overview and approval, persevering with what has been an intensive public course of,” he mentioned.
©2025 Tampa Bay Instances. Go to tampabay.com. Distributed by Tribune Content material Company, LLC.
